Investor Backed Scale Ups
15 min read
Aligning Leadership to the Scaling Journey
Subscribe to our global magazine to hear our latest insights, opinions and featured articles.
In today’s volatile and fragmented geopolitical landscape—marked by U.S.-China rivalry, unpredictable tariffs and shifting trade alliances, supply chain disruptions, and rising nationalism—leadership in Asia Pacific is being constantly redefined. In this context, understanding how even high-performing leaders might falter under pressure is critical.
HDS data in our research reveal a recurring risk profile among Industrial sector leaders in Asia Pacific. Four derailment themes consistently emerge:
These traits can power success in high-growth or uncertain environments—but if overused or left unchecked, they can cloud judgment, destabilize teams, and diminish impact. In a region where uncertainty is the norm, this dual nature matters more than ever.
Our insights come from leaders managing capital-intensive, often multinational operations—spanning engineering, supply chain, chemicals, energy, and heavy manufacturing. These leaders typically have P&L responsibility, drive results, and navigate complexity across diverse markets.
This isn’t about tech founders, start-ups, or consumer brands. Our focus is on leaders driving emerging market growth, infrastructure projects, plant turnarounds, or regulatory challenges from India to Indonesia.
It's important to acknowledge potential selection bias in the data. Leaders with traits like Reserved, Cautious, or Skeptical—linked to introversion, guardedness or risk aversion—may be under-represented. These individuals may have self-selected out of the process. As a result, the dataset may lean toward leaders more open to self-exposure and feedback—those already inclined to the visible derailers outlined earlier. Even so, the insights reflect recognizable patterns shaped by the business norms and pressures of Asia Pacific.
Colorful leaders are magnetic, expressive, and skilled at building wide networks. In relationship-driven markets like Southeast Asia, this offers a major advantage. They bring energy, visibility, and momentum—traits that help win stakeholders, bridge cultures, and rally teams in family-run or state-owned enterprises.
Under stress, they may seek applause over substance—focusing on inspiration rather than impact or dominating conversations without results. In sensitive settings, like political talks in Malaysia or managing government-linked partners in China, this can hurt credibility and decisions.
These leaders excel in uncertainty. They’re bold, boundary-pushing, and persuasive—able to gain early buy-in for greenfield projects or pivots. In high-growth, high-risk settings, this mindset often drives success.
They can blur the line between vision and manipulation—sidestepping accountability, cutting corners, or pushing initiatives without full risk assessment. In Asia’s trust-based cultures, this can harm reputations. Internally, unpredictability may reduce psychological safety.
Imaginative leaders think big, challenge norms, and champion innovation—crucial as industrial firms digitize, automate, and adapt to shifting talent needs. Their vision drives transformation when old models fall short.
They can lose touch with reality—falling for unworkable ideas, changing course too often, or neglecting execution. In traditional cultures like Korea or Japan, where discipline and follow-through matter, this can alienate peers and erode trust.
Bold leaders offer clarity and confidence. When courage is needed to move forward or during times of crises—like the pandemic or regulatory shifts—they cut through noise, make tough calls, and provide stability.
Unchecked, boldness becomes over-confidence. These leaders may ignore dissent, overrate their abilities, or override collaboration. The result? Risk of toxic cultures, stifled innovation, and lack of honest feedback.
These traits—Colorful, Mischievous, Imaginative, and Bold—provide insight into how Asia Pacific’s industrial leaders are wired. In the right conditions, these leaders are energetic, courageous, and forward-looking.
They’re often the first to act and the ones willing to take on transformation head-first. But strengths overplayed become liabilities. Leaders and organizations that recognize and address this duality are more likely to succeed in high-stakes environments. That means:
In today’s Asia Pacific, technical skill and decisiveness aren’t enough. Leaders who thrive know themselves—not just what drives their success, but how those same drivers can derail them under stress. Industrial leaders in the region tend to be bold, visionary, and action-oriented. These traits are vital in uncertain times. But without self-awareness, they can also lead to rash decisions, eroded trust, and strategic missteps.
To be clear: we’re not promoting a single leadership style. Some lead with charisma, others through discipline or quiet influence. What truly sets leaders apart is adaptability—knowing when to take charge, and when to listen, reflect, and adjust.
If you are a leader today:
The Hogan Development Survey reminds us: derailment isn’t about flaws—it’s about being blind to them. The best leaders aren’t perfect—they’re self-aware, open to feedback, and committed to growth.
In a region where volatility is the norm, that kind of leadership isn’t just useful—it’s essential.
______________________________________________________________
Get in touch. Follow the links below to discover more, or contact our dedicated leadership experts from your local Odgers Berndtson office to discuss your executive talent requirements.
Services
Industries
Functions
Investor Backed Scale Ups
15 min read
Aligning Leadership to the Scaling Journey
Leadership Insights
6 min read
Leadership Predictions 2024: Talent Market and Board Challenges
Investor Backed Scale Ups
Navigating Profitability: How the Scale Up Collective Assists Company Growth
Subscribe to our global magazine to hear our latest insights, opinions and featured articles.