How CEOs Develop a Rigorous Framework for Collaborative Decision-Making

In today's fast-paced and complex business environment, CEOs can no longer afford to make all the decisions on their own. The nature of the issues they face are increasingly intricate, requiring considerations of both short and long-term impacts. These decisions often involve multiple dimensions, lack precedents, and arrive at a faster pace than ever before.

While a few exceptional CEOs possess the intellectual agility and horsepower to navigate these new complexities, many leaders benefit from collaborative insight. The speed at which these decisions must be made necessitates a systemic approach where multiple perspectives and unknown variables are considered. This allows for critical checks and balances to ensure nothing is overlooked.

Rich, secure and fast decision-making

Collaborative decisions that aim for strong results, rather than mere consensus, require additional time. Adopting a systematic decision model releases creative thinking, encourages diverse debate, and enables constructive challenge without sacrificing pace.

The CEO then allocates responsibilities for gathering information, validating hypotheses and devising creative solutions.

The findings are reviewed collaboratively, new or emerging dimensions are evaluated and ‘go or no-go’ decisions are taken. Incorporating this structured approach within a team, enhances the capacity to make more informed, secure and swift decisions.

The systematic decision-making approach

1. Shape: Identify the problem and consider hypotheses that impact the decision. Define the targeted outcomes or endgame and what is in or out of scope. Establish the criteria for identifying and evaluating options. Then, specify the necessary data and consultation.
2. Evaluate: Given the findings, do the outcomes remain the same? Identify any adaptations made that differ from the hypotheses. Compare the original options and any new emerging ones. Determine the best option, assess if it is achievable and identify any required compromises or adaptations.
3. Approve: Can we decide, or do we need more information or to explore other options? Identify the risks and ensure alignment among all parties. Define the next steps, assign accountability and confirm motivation and support. Establish reporting touchpoints, timelines, and evidence for the decision makers.
4. Monitor delivery: Are the targeted outcomes on track? Identify the evidence and determine necessary adjustments to deliver the right outcomes. Assess if the outcomes are still achievable and decide if adjustments will work or if the plan needs to be reconsidered.
5. Review: What did we do well at each stage of the process? What could we do better? What would enhance our pace of decision-making without sacrificing quality? What impact would it have had on the outcomes of that decision?

Emotional Intelligence (EQ)

Effective decision-making requires a deep understanding of one's own biases and weaknesses.

A CEO's blind spots regarding their inclinations can lead to decisions that are not in the best interests of the organisation. For instance, risk aversion in a CEO could inadvertently limit options, require additional explorations, or cause inaction and delays as issues get "kicked into the long grass." Similarly, a CEO must discern their team members’ biases, determining when it is appropriate for them to contribute directly and when it is better to allow others to take the lead.

Applying EQ also means creating psychological safety in teams for effective collaboration, as it encourages more open dialogue and free exchange of ideas without fear of repercussions. When team members feel safe to voice their opinions, challenge assumptions and raise potential risks and problems, it leads to richer discussions and more informed, balanced decisions.

Additionally, by utilising psychometric profiling, CEOs can gain a deeper understanding of the diverse mindsets within their team, the dynamics of debates, and potential biases in decision-making that arise from cognitive agility and natural behaviours. This insight empowers CEOs to effectively manage the stages of systematic decision-making. Also, it offers each executive the opportunity to enhance their contribution, enjoy the experience, and receive recognition as part of a high-performing team.

Some decisions need courage

Most decisions are not clear-cut. CEOs must have the courage to decide, even when the outcomes are uncertain, and be willing to live with the consequences. The systematic approach helps identify when it is more beneficial to move forward rather than continue exploring options, which builds resilience within the team.

By showing they can make tough decisions and stand by them, CEOs can inspire their teams to do the same, thereby enhancing the organisation’s overall decision-making capability and resilience.

_______________________________________________________________

Get in touch. Follow the links below to discover more, or contact our dedicated leadership experts from your local Odgers Berndtson office here.